|
Most of us know the difference between right and
wrong. We have been raised to respect the
properties of others, be it physical or
intellectual in nature. We would never dream of
walking into someone's home and taking an item from
them to use for our own enjoyment without first
seeking their permission, and it reality we most
likely wouldn't even think of asking for such a
thing.
But technology makes the playing field a bit
hazy. With the ability to use technology to do
things so easily, and in many cases with anonymity,
we find that people have different ethical
behaviors in this arena. Why should that be? Is it
because they think they won't get caught? Is it
because they are lazy? Is it because they think
whatever is "out there" is theirs for the
taking?
|
|
|
For the most part, the same rules apply to
technology related products and information as do
elsewhere, and an entire branch of the legal
industry has developed to deal with what is now
classified as Cyber Crime. It could be as innocent
as plagiarizing a paper for a class, or as damaging
as having one's identity stolen because of
unscrupulous actions to break into your account
information at a bank. Whatever the nature of the
behavior, it is critical that we recognize the
issues surrounding the legal and ethical use of
technology, both personally and professionally.
Computer
ethics is concerned with standards of
conduct as they pertain to computers and related
technologies.
As educators, we must discuss ethical behavior
with our students, staff and faculty to ensure that
proper ethical behavior is followed at all times.
One suggestion is to post the following list near
computers used in schools. The list, originally
created in 1992, is generic in concept, although
new technologies might need to be addressed in some
of the items. For example, item #6 should be
rephrased to include specific forms of media rather
than simply stating software, which implies only
computer programs. In today's world, the illegal
duplication of music is much more wide spread than
at the time of this publication.
|
|
THE
TEN COMMANDMENTS FOR COMPUTER
ETHICS
Created by the Computer Ethics
Institute
|
|
1.
|
Thou shalt not use a computer to harm
other people.
|
|
2.
|
Thou shalt not interfere with other
people's computer work.
|
|
3.
|
Thou shalt not snoop around in other
people's files.
|
|
4.
|
Thou shalt not use a computer to
steal.
|
|
5.
|
Thou shalt not use a computer to bear
false witness.
|
|
6.
|
Thou shalt not use or copy software for
which you have not paid.
|
|
7.
|
Thou shalt not use other people's
computer resources without
authorization.
|
|
8.
|
Thou shalt not appropriate other
people's intellectual output.
|
|
9.
|
Thou shalt think about the social
consequences of the program you write.
|
|
10.
|
Thou shalt use a computer in ways that
show consideration and respect.
|
|
|
Within schools, there are
obvious violations to ethical behavior when using
technology. A student might sabotage another's
student's work if that work is not password
protected. A student might try to break into a
teacher's gradebook, or access a test or quiz
planned for the class. Less obvious actions might
include a teacher finding another teacher's lesson
plan and using it as his or her own original
work.
In some cases, teachers have lost computer
privileges because of their behavior. For example.
a middle school teacher was denied access to the
Internet after it was discovered that she accessed
eBay during school hours. A principal was found
researching ski conditions in Colorado for his
upcoming vacation, and a custodian was found
checking professional sports scores and
participating in an online betting scheme. In all
cases, these employees were given reprimands, and
were allowed to remain in their positions, however,
there have been cases of educators who have lost
their positions because of their use of technology
in an unauthorized manner, often times not even
realizing that they were engaged in unethical
behavior.
Consider the teacher who was planning her wedding
and designed the wedding invitations on one of the
school's computers. She had purchased special paper
and printed the invitations using the school's
laser printer in the workroom, set up a database of
guests and their gifts, and was so proud of herself
for knowing how to use technology to do all of
this. Her colleagues thought she was amazing, and
talk spread quickly to the main office. Her files
were confiscated and a letter of reprimand was
placed in her permanent employment records. This
unfortunate event made it impossible for her to be
considered for leadership positions, and proved to
be very embarrassing. She eventually left the
school division.
On March 21, 2006, the Virginian-Pilot published
an article regarding a teacher's use of the email
system which was in violation of the school
division's acceptable use policy on technology use.
In the article it was stated that she had sent an
email message to all employees of the school
division announcing her husband's candidacy for a
school board position in a neighboring city, and
inviting everyone to attend a campaign meeting for
him. He had been employed by the school division in
which the email was distributed. She was
reprimanded because it was against school board
policy to engage in support of political
candidates.
When you are first offered a contract as a teacher,
the excitement and anticipation of actually
fulfilling your dreams to become a teacher are
paramount in your mind. As you sign the paperwork
presented to you, remember that you will be asked
to sign an Acceptable Use Policy regulating what
you can and can not do regarding the use of the
technology available to you. take the time to read
through the document carefully. Ignorance is no
excuse when faced with legal action. It is up to
you to be responsible for this information. In
doing so, you will model effective ethical
behavior.
|
|